Engauge Digitizer

Compose and Share Mathematics NotesFormulae Using LaTeX. Tableur 45 logiciels Windows tlcharger sur Clubic. Gratuit, fiable et rapide. . , 2000. Engauge Digitizer 4. 1Long term maintenance of weight loss with non surgical interventions in obese adults systematic review and meta analyses of randomised controlled trials. Study selection. The search identified 3. The table summarises overall details of the studies, with full details provided in appendix 1. Table. Overall details of studies included in review of interventions for weight loss maintenance see appendix 1 for more detailed version of this tableFig 1 Flowchart of systematic process for report identification. Risk of bias. The average inter rater agreement for risk of bias indicators was good Krippendorfs 0. Allocation concealment was judged to be adequate in 1. Seventeen studies reported blinding, including descriptions of blinding of participants n1. Blinding of participants, interveners, data analysts, and outcome assessors was judged to be adequate for three, none, one, and four studies, respectively. Data analysis of all participants for example, last entry carried forward or baseline observation carried forward was reported by 2. Fig 2 Risk of bias graph showing review authors judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies. Study characteristicsintervention descriptions. Studies were published in 1. Most studies n2. US other locations were Europe 1. New Zealand n1, and Australia n1. The weighted average age of participants was 4. BMI before weight loss was 3. This quick tip show how to extract XYZ point data from a SolidWorks file for use in other applications. Luminous intensity vs luminous flux. In photometry, luminous flux is the measure of the total perceived power of light while luminous intensity is a measure of the. Gnuplot links This is a completely unorganised list of gnuplot related web and ftp sites. Please write to gnuplotbeta mailing list if you know any other useful links. Trials included a mix of overweight and obese women and men n2. Studies sampling both women and men included a weighted average of 7. Three studies recruited individuals who had lost weight in the community,2. The 4. 2 studies including a weight loss induction phase initially recruited 9. Initial attrition was mainly because of study dropout, although failure to meet weight loss andor adherence criteria prevented entry into the maintenance phase for individuals in 1. A total of 6. 27. Fourteen studies disclosed funding from industry. Initial weight loss phases. Of the 4. 2 studies that included a formal weight loss phase, the average weight loss across studies ranged from 4. The length of weight loss treatment before the maintenance phase ranged from two to 1. Most advocated change in behaviourlifestyle, diet, and physical activity n2. Other studies used a diet only n1. Some studies used a combination of pharmacotherapy in addition to behaviourallifestyle change n3 or placebo treatment for pharmacotherapy and behaviourallifestyle change n1. The dietary approaches advocated were described as general energy deficit diets n1. Jday, n1. 1, low energy diets defined as 1. Jday, n7, and a combination of the two n4. Some studies provided no detail n6 or explicitly stated not using a dietary approach for weight loss n1. The physical activity recommendations for weight loss varied considerably, with walking as the most commonly recommended activity n4. Intensity of recommended physical activity varied from 2. Two studies provided exercise classes. Most studies provided no details of recommendations for physical activity. Several studies n1. Entry criteria ranged from 5 to 1. Three studies recruiting from the community without a formal weight loss phase required objective evidence of either 5 weight loss in the previous six months. Weight loss maintenance phase. For maintenance of weight loss, most studies examined behaviourallifestyle interventions for diet and physical activity n2. Some studies focused on dietary n3 or exercise approaches n2 only. Other interventions included pharmacological n5, meal replacement n5, food supplement n3, or other n2 interventions. Most study arms for which dietary approaches were reported continuing to prescribe energy deficit diets n2. Some arms were not prescribed any diet n7, and others were prescribed a mixture of weight loss and weight loss maintenance diets, depending on weight maintenance goals n3. Most descriptions of interventions, however, were unclear or provided no detail as to whether dietary approaches targeted further weight loss or maintenance of existing weight loss. Recommendations for physical activity mostly promoted a general increase in physical activity n2. Some interventions provided specific recommendations, including walking n8 or resistance training n1 or provided exercise classes n2. Nine studies advocated maintenance of the physical activity levels recommended in the previous weight loss phase. Many studies did not provide details of physical activity to maintain weight loss, were unclear, or did not provide physical activity recommendations. The five studies prescribing pharmacotherapy used orlistat at different doses 3. The three studies examining dietary supplements included conjugated linoleic acid n1, fibre n1, carbohydrate, or a combination of carbohydrate, fibre, chromium picolinate, and caffeine n1. The five studies examining meal replacements included Optifast n2, Nutrilet n1, the Cambridge diet n1, or the option of food boxes containing food in line with the recommended diet n1. The two studies examining alternative treatments included the use of a corset n1 and acupressure n1. Modes of delivery. Intervention providerIntervention arms delivered in person were facilitated by one n5. Format and deliveryMost studies were delivered either in a group n4. Other delivery formats included individual n5, internet n5, mail n5, telephone n3, mail and telephone n2, or group, mail, and telephone n1. SettingResearch settings were generally poorly described. Those that reported study settings included home, often through the internet or phone n1. Duration and intensityMost weight loss maintenance interventions lasted 1. Intensity of intervention arms ranged from a minimum of once every three months. SD 3. 1. 9 contacts a month. Longer interventions tended to offer more intervention contacts, r0. Plt 0. 0. 01. MaterialsMost provided materials were paper based such as session handouts or self monitoring cardsbooklets n3. Other materials included the provision of pharmacological agents and corresponding placebos, food supplements, or meal replacements n2. Some studies offered incentives and refunded money, provided lottery tickets, or coupons n6 one study provided participants with corsets n1. One trial provided two study arms with scales for regular self weighing and a toolbox of materials that were accessed depending on progress n2. Meta analysisintervention effectiveness. Table A in appendix 2 provides a summary of all meta analytic findings. Behaviourallifestyle v control. At 1. 2 months, 1. I23. 6 fig 3. Fig 3 Mean difference in weight change at 1. BCbehaviour therapy post treatment therapy contact condition BCAbehaviour therapy post treatment therapy contact aerobic exercise maintenance condition BCASbehaviour therapy post treatment therapy contact aerobic exercise maintenance social influence maintenance programme condition F2. Fface to face condition, FIPSfrequent in person support condition MIPSminimal in person support condition Intinternet condition PSTproblem solving therapy condition RPTrelapse prevention training condition SFskill focus condition, phonetelephone condition WFweight focus condition. Though Eggers test was non significant P0. A in appendix 2.

. .